Pukovnik Collonny, ikona humanizma

By | 2015-05-10

3130690Umirovljeni US Army pukovnik Collonny najpopularniji je i najodlikovaniji vojnik ikada. Nakon umirovljenja i dalje je aktivan u svojoj organizaciji New World Watchers, kroz koju obavlja razne poslove, uglavnom za US vladu. U mainstream medijima je uvijek prezentiran kao borac za slobodu, a među hordama obožavatelja uživa status gurua, ili čak i utjelovljenja Boga. Kao tradicionalni južnjački liberalni demokrat, kako se izjašnjava, Collonny smatra da su svi ljudi jednaki, ali da američki državljani, kao potomci prve slobodarske države u svijetu, ipak igraju odlučujuću ulogu u geopoitičkom, ekonomskom i općenito humanističkom ekosistemu, te da se njihova ugroženost i patnja ne može mjeriti sa, recimo, Sirijskim prognanicima. Zanimljiva je činjenica da on osobno nije potomak slobodarskih Amerikanaca, nego je dijete radničke klase, od oca talijanskog Irca i majke Armenke, doseljenih u SAD početkom prošlog stoljeća. U svojim kampovima ne dozvoljava korištenje usluga najstarijeg zanata, no na domjencima bogatim i utjecajnim Senatorima, bez kojih bi uspjeh njegovih operacija bio upitan, poslužuje žive ljudske pladnjeve sa 13ogodišnjim Ukrajinkama, kao seksualnu atrakciju koja gotovo uvijek ima sretni završetak. Za senatore, naravno.

Zanima li vas što bi za pukovnika Collonnya rekli istinski humanisti, etičari, aktivisti za ljudska prava?

Vjerujem da ne toliko koliko mene zanima tko je vegancima podvalio keptn Votsona, i kako.

One thought on “Pukovnik Collonny, ikona humanizma

  1. kulisleg Post author

    Alan O’Reilly :
    As usual, any suggestion that Sea Shepherd may be problematic in terms of both veganism and animal rights meets with a flurry of point-missing from its supporters.

    I don’t have any issue with Sea Shepherd doing (notwithstanding Dede’s comments) what it says on the tin but there is no doubt that the organisation is problematic from both vegan and animal rights perspectives. It is speciesist by its very nature and it beggars belief that anybody could deny this. Concentrating resources on one or a few species simply invokes all the problems associated with Single Issue Campaigns which I’m not going to repeat here. The situation would be mitigated to a certain extent if Sea Shepherd conducted their operations from a platform of promoting veganism, but it does not. The reason is very simple, it is not an animal rights organisation so it has no need to. Yet while it eschews animal rights it takes every opportunity to solicit revenue from the movement. If nothing else, this is blatantly dishonest.

    The issue here is about where vegans should direct their financial and other support to the best advantage of animal rights and the eventual elimination of animal exploitation. Clearly that is not towards Sea Shepherd.

    Oh, as an afterthought, perhaps one of its supporters can tell us why if Sea Shepherd’s primary concern is saving whales it doesn’t expend more resources on combatting drift netting, which kills many times more whales that Japanese whalers (not to mention all the other marine mammals, turtles, sharks and other sea creatures destroyed in the process).

Odgovori